PER CURIAM.
The jury, on conflicting evidence, resolved the contested (second) issue in defendant's favor; and there was ample evidence to support this verdict. After careful consideration of plaintiff's assignments of error, we find no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.
No error.
WINBORNE and HIGGINS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
