WOODARD v. NIPPER

No. 36817.

285 P.2d 208 (1955)

Robert N. WOODARD, Petitioner, v. Andrew J. NIPPER, Barbour Drilling Company, a corporation, Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, a Corporation, Wise and Liebel, a Law Partnership, composed of Clay Wise and W.E. Liebel and the State Industrial Commission of Oklahoma, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 7, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B.H. Carey, Oklahoma City, for petitioner.

Wise & Liebel, Geo. E. Fisher, J.A. O'Toole, Oklahoma City, Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondents.


HALLEY, Justice.

On November 29, 1954, Robert N. Woodard filed a notice of claim for attorney's fee in which he stated that pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the State Industrial Commission of Oklahoma he was claiming an attorney's fee by reason of his employment by and representation of Andrew J. Nipper before said Commission; that he had a contract with Nipper to represent him for twenty per cent of Nipper's recovery; that pursuant to said employment he filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases