HURT v. TRANSP. CO.

No. 34376.

164 Ohio St. 329 (1955)

HURT, APPELLEE, v. CHARLES J. ROGERS TRANSPORTATION CO., APPELLANT; ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 14, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Harrison, Spangenberg & Hull, for appellee.

Messrs. McConnell, Blackmore, Cory, Burke & Kundtz, Mr. S. Burns Weston and Mr. Mark O'Neill, for appellant.


BELL, J.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether, as a matter of law, Rogers is entitled to final judgment.

Rogers bases its right to judgment as a matter of law on three contentions: 1. There is no proof that Rogers was negligent. 2. The inferences upon which plaintiff must rely are not permissible because (a) they are not reasonable and (b) they spring from other inferences. 3. Plaintiff's inferred facts were rebutted by uncontradicted direct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases