1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 134 Cal.App.2d
  5. 134 Cal.App.2d 352 (1955)
 

FAUS v. PACIFIC ELEC. RY. CO.

Docket Nos. 20762, 20763.

134 Cal.App.2d 352 (1955)

285 P.2d 1017

L.C. FAUS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Defendants and Respondents; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Intervener and Appellant. J. BENTON VAN NUYS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Defendants and Respondents; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Intervener and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

July 13, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and Milnor E. Gleaves, Deputy County Counsel, for Intervener and Appellant.

Paul Overton, Holbrook, Tarr, Carter & O'Neill, W. Sumner Holbrook, Jr., Francis H. O'Neill, Chapman, Frazer & Lindley and D.W. Chapman for Respondents.

FOX, J.

From judgments denying its motions for leave to file complaints in intervention in the above entitled actions, the county of Los Angeles appeals. The parties are agreed that the essential issues are identical with respect to both matters and that the cases be considered together on appeal.

The salient facts are these: Beginning in the year 1903 and continuing until September, 1951, the defendant Pacific Electric Railway Company (hereinafter called...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases