MOORE v. SMOTKIN

No. 5870.

79 Ariz. 401 (1955)

291 P.2d 216

Thad MOORE, Warren Peterson and William E. Stanford, as members of and constituting the Arizona State Tax Commission, Appellants, v. Ed E. SMOTKIN and G.W. Bromley, a partnership doing business under the name and style of American Homes Association, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

December 13, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Morrison, Atty. Gen., D. Kelly Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

James Elliott Dunseath, Tucson, James E. Flynn, Phoenix, for appellees.

Ryley, Carlock & Ralston, F. Britton Burns, Stahl, Murphy & Blakley, Alfred B. Carr, Phoenix, amici curiae.


STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Following our decision of May 17, 1955 in Moore v. Smotkin, 79 Ariz. 77, 283 P.2d 1029, appellants filed their petition for rehearing. The assertion has been made that the decision, in construing the term "business of contracting" to require a contractual relationship, has clouded the present administrative interpretation of the Excise Revenue Act, particularly Section 73-1329...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases