LILIENTHAL v. HASTINGS CLOTHING CO.

Docket No. 16235.

131 Cal.App.2d 343 (1955)

280 P.2d 824

HILDA S. LILIENTHAL, Appellant, v. HASTINGS CLOTHING COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 8, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sloss & Eliot and Elmer P. Delany for Appellant.

Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and Bledsoe, Smith & Cathcart for Respondents.


WOOD (Fred B.), J.

In this action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff, an invitee at a retail store, slipped and fell on a waxed floor, verdict was for the defendants. Plaintiff-appellant claims reversible error in the giving of instructions and the admission of evidence.

[1] (1) Instructions on assumption of risk, given at the request of one of the defendants, included the text of Nos. 207 and 207-B of B.A.J.I., third revised edition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases