GALE-OPPENHEIMER v. COHEN


208 Misc. 261 (1955)

Gale-Oppenheimer, Plaintiff, v. Tieney Cohen et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

March 14, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. J. Ginsberg for defendants.

Friedman, Glick & Wachtel for plaintiff.


CORTLAND A. JOHNSON, J.

The defendants move to suppress and prohibit the use in this action of some recordings of telephone conversations between one of the partner-plaintiffs and one of the defendants and his attorney.

For the purpose of determining this motion, the court assumes that it is established that the conversations were recorded without defendant's or his attorney's knowledge, before the action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases