1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 131 Cal.App.2d
  5. 131 Cal.App.2d 332 (1955)
 

PARROTT & CO. v. CITY & COUNTY OF S.F.

Docket Nos. 16106, 16112, 16113.

131 Cal.App.2d 332 (1955)

280 P.2d 881

PARROTT AND COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant. BELLOWS AND COMPANY, INC. (a Corporation), Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant. JAS. BARCLAY AND COMPANY, LIMITED, et al., Respondents, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 8, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Lawrence S. Mana, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellant.

J. Albert Hutchinson, Theodore R. Meyer, Hart H. Spiegel, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, Edward W. Rosston, Richard E. Guggenhime and Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe for Respondents.

PETERS, P.J.

These are consolidated appeals by the City and County of San Francisco from judgments in three separate actions ordering the city to refund certain personal property taxes imposed by it on certain imported liquors.

The factual backgrounds of and the law applicable to the three consolidated cases are similar. Respondents are importers from foreign countries of intoxicating liquors. On the first Monday of March, 1952, each respondent owned and possessed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases