1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 142 Conn.
  5. 142 Conn. 320 (1955)
 

MURPHY v. DANTOWITZ

142 Conn. 320 (1955)

SARAH R. MURPHY v. PEARL DANTOWITZ ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 18, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas A. Finkelstone, with whom was George N. Finkelstone, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Julius B. Kuriansky, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

INGLIS, C. J., BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE and COVELLO, JS.

BALDWIN, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against three defendants to recover damages for personal injuries. Two of the defendants, Pearl Dantowitz and Morris B. Rettner, were described in the complaint as owners in possession and control of a tenement house in Stamford. The third defendant is The 170 Lawn Corporation, which at the time the action was brought was the holder of the record title to the premises. It will be referred to herein as the corporation....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases