LESTER v. ELLIOTT BROS. TRUCKING CO.


18 N.J. 434 (1955)

114 A.2d 8

SETH LESTER, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. ELLIOTT BROS. TRUCKING CO., INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 16, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Mortimer Wald argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Mayer and Mayer, attorneys).

Mr. Francis H. Pykon argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Henry M. Grosman, attorney).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge FRANCIS in the court below.

WACHENFELD, J. (dissenting).

The appellant's claim was discredited in the lower tribunals because they found he was not on his employer's premises in connection with his employment.

I come to an opposite conclusion. Regardless of Lester's motive in going to the terminal outside of working...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases