1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 271 Wis.
  5. 271 Wis. 176 (1955)
 

WADDELL v. MAMAT

271 Wis. 176 (1955)

WADDELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, vs. MAMAT, Defendant and Appellant: ANDREWS, Impleaded Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 8, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Irving D. Gaines of Milwaukee, for Edna Waddell, and by Raymond J. Moore of Milwaukee, for Hasson Mamat.

For the respondent there was a brief by Quarles, Spence & Quarles, attorneys, and Edmund W. Powell and Anton Motz of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Powell.

MARTIN, J.

Respondent raises the question whether this is an appealable order. The order denies to appellants a substantial right given them by sec. 85.05 (3), Stats. 1951. It is a right comparable to that granted under sec. 326.12 which has been held to be a provisional remedy. See 1 Callaghan's Wis. Dig., Appeal and Error, p. 293, sec. 197. An order denying such a right is appealable under sec. 274.33.

Sec. 85.05...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases