BALDWIN v. HINTON

No. 531.

90 S.E.2d 316 (1955)

243 N.C. 113

Clara Mae BALDWIN, Lucille Baldwin and Willie James Baldwin, and Clara Mae Baldwin, Next Friend of Mary Frances Baldwin Moten and husband, J. W. Moten, and Leola Baldwin, Minors, v. G. C. HINTON and wife, Eunice W. Hinton.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 23, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. M. Noble, Smithfield, for defendants-appellants.

Lyon & Lyon, Smithfield, for plaintiffs-appellees.


BOBBITT, Justice.

While nominally a cause of action to remove a cloud from plaintiffs' title, this is essentially an action in ejectment. True, possession by plaintiffs is not a prerequisite to an action brought under G.S. § 41-10. Satterwhite v. Gallagher, 173 N.C. 525, 92 S.E. 369; Vick v. Winslow, 209 N.C. 540, 183 S.E. 750. Nor is it necessary in such an action to allege or establish either trespass or unlawful possession by defendants. But where, as here...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases