ANTHONY O'BOYLE, INC. v. THE ROBIN HOOD

No. 18212.

134 F.Supp. 271 (1955)

ANTHONY O'BOYLE, Inc., as owner of THE Barge RUSSELL NO. 21, Libelant, v. THE Tug ROBIN HOOD and THE Tug DYNAMIC, Respondents.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

May 13, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, Proctors for Libelant, Gerald J. McKernan and James N. Allan, New York City, of counsel.

Alexander & Ash, New York City, Proctors for Tug Robin Hood, Sidney A. Schwartz, New York City, advocate.

Purdy, Lamb & Catoggio, New York City, Proctors for Tug Dynamic, Vincent A. Catoggio, New York City, advocate.


ABRUZZO, District Judge.

On November 13, 1951, an interlocutory decree was entered holding both respondents, the tug Robin Hood and Dynamic, equally responsible for damages sustained by the steel tank barge, Russell No. 21, in a collision that occurred on August 24, 1944, more than ten years ago. There had been a delay of seven years from the date of the collision to the trial of the libel.

The Commissioner appointed by the Court held hearings on August 25...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases