TUCHMAN v. LOLA, INC.


208 Misc. 195 (1955)

Dora Tuchman, Respondent, v. Lola, Inc., Defendant, and Myron Fink, Doing Business as Hotel St. Regis Pharmacy, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 14, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Nielsen and John P. Smith for appellant.

William C. Sherr for respondent.

HOFSTADTER, SCHREIBER and HECHT, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

There was no causal connection shown between the claimed injuries and the use of defendant's preparation. Plaintiff's testimony alone, unsupported by competent medical evidence, was insufficient to establish that the foundation or "make-up" was the competent producing cause of the injuries and "the sole possible one" (Cahill v. Inecto, 208 App. Div. 191...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases