1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 142 Conn.
  5. 142 Conn. 236 (1955)
 

CONON v. ADMINISTRATOR

142 Conn. 236 (1955)

STELLA CONON ET AL. v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT MARIE AMARAL ET AL. v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 5, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Mandelstam, with whom, on the brief, was Morris P. Glushien, of the New York bar, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Harry Silverstone, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was John J. Bracken, attorney general, for the appellee (defendant).

BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE, DALY and ALCORN, JS.

ALCORN, J.

These two appeals were presented together because they embrace an identical issue. The plaintiffs are representative of others in similar cases the decision of which turns upon the decisive issue here. The applicable facts are, in most respects, identical, while minor differences make the two cases representative of opposing extremes of the group which they represent. The attacks made on the commissioner's finding have been withdrawn. The issue is whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases