1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 37 N.J.
  5. 37 N.J. Super. 340 (1955)
 

SARRIS v. A.A. PRUZICK & CO.

37 N.J. Super. 340 (1955)

117 A.2d 305

HARRY SARRIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. A.A. PRUZICK & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 11, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard Chazen argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Baker, Garber and Chazen, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph V. Cullum argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Townsend & Doyle, attorneys; Mr. Thomas F. Doyle, of counsel).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

At the conclusion of the evidence adduced by the plaintiff to establish the defendant's liability, the court granted the defendant's motion for an involuntary dismissal of the plaintiff's alleged cause of action.

The following summary of the evidence is necessarily composed in a fashion supporting most favorably the plaintiff's factual allegations. McKinney v. Public Service Interstate Transp. Co....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases