CAYTON, Chief Judge.
The trial court gave judgment against Mr. Mitchell for a small balance due on garments purchased by his wife. Seeking a reversal, his principal contentions are that credit had been extended not to him but to his wife (from whom he was later separated); that he had been providing for her support; that his wfe had no authority to pledge his credit; and that the articles of clothing were not necessaries.
With reference to the last two contentions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
