ROBERSON v. PRUDEN

No. 27.

89 S.E.2d 250 (1955)

242 N.C. 632

D. M. ROBERSON and wife, Ethel G. Roberson, v. P. D. PRUDEN and wife, Lillian L. Pruden.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman & Rodman, Plymouth, W. D. Boone, Winton, for defendant appellants.

Peel & Peel, Williamston, Bailey & Bailey, Plymouth, for plaintiff appellees.


DEVIN, Justice.

The defendants assign as error the ruling of the trial judge in denying their motion for judgment of nonsuit, but after a careful examination of all the evidence shown by the record before us, we reach the conclusion that the motion was properly denied.

True, some portion of plaintiffs' evidence might justify the inference that the agreement entered into between the parties before the sale of the land was merely a parol agreement to purchase...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases