1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 90 S.E.2d
  5. 90 S.E.2d 247 (1955)
 

NOWELL v. NEAL

No. 458.

90 S.E.2d 247 (1955)

243 N.C. 175

Virginia N. NOWELL v. J. Walter NEAL and Alfred T. Hamilton.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 23, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vaughan S. Winborne, John A. Robertson and Samuel Pretlow Winborne, Raleigh, for plaintiff, appellant.

Smith, Leach, Anderson & Dorsett, Raleigh, for defendant, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After a protracted trial, involving the consideration of voluminous testimony, the jury resolved the controversial (first) issue in favor of defendant Neal. Careful consideration of plaintiff's assignments of error, brought forward and argued in the brief filed in her behalf, discloses no error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases