DeBOW v. HATFIELD


35 N.J. Super. 291 (1955)

114 A.2d 10

ROY S. DeBOW, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BESSIE LETSON HATFIELD, WIDOW OF GEORGE ELY HATFIELD, DECEASED, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 12, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Hugh C. Spernow argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hunziker and Hunziker, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel Morris argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

The present appeal involves the Tax Act of 1903 (c. 208), long a source of litigation and still exhibiting a flicker of life despite legislative interment in 1930. L. 1930, c. 37, p. 202, repealing §§ 1 to 26, 32 to 60. Plaintiff relied upon that act in bringing his quiet title action in the Chancery Division. He appeals from the final judgment entered in defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases