1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 203 Or.
  5. 203 Or. 123 (1955)
 

HEILIG v. DANIEL ET AL

203 Or. 123 (1955)

275 P.2d 854

278 P.2d 988

HEILIG v. DANIEL ET AL. and SCHWABE, ADMINISTRATOR ET AL.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 3, 1954.

Petition for rehearing denied November 24, 1954.

Opinion revised January 19, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Veatch, of Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Veatch, Bradshaw & Veatch, of Portland.

David Fain, of Portland, argued the cause for defendants-respondents. With him on the brief were Harry Hollis Daniel, Black Kendall & Fain, and Paul Gerhardt, all of Portland.

Nicholas Jaureguy, of Portland, argued the cause for intervenors-respondents. With him on the brief were Cake, Jaureguy & Hardy, Carter, Cameron & Carter, all of Portland.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and LUSK, BRAND and TOOZE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

BRAND, J.

This suit involves the construction of a testamentary trust. The plaintiff George W. Heilig, as an individual and as administrator of the estate of Fred Heilig deceased, seeks a decree directing the defendant trustees to account to the estate of Fred Heilig for all of the assets of the trust, to fix the compensation of the trustees, to award attorney's fees, to determine the amount of estate taxes if any and to distribute the remainder...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases