The plaintiff, having failed to file the order for substituted service, the supporting affidavits, the summons and the proof of service thereof within the statutory time limit (Civ. Prac. Act, § 231), now moves for an order directing their filing nunc pro tunc.
Jurisdiction over the defendant was obtained by the fact that he was served in the manner directed by the order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.