The UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERCHANTS MATRIX CUT SYNDICATE, Inc., and Intertype Corporation, Cross-Claimants-Appellees.
INTERTYPE CORPORATION, Cross-Claimant-Appellee,
v.
CLARK-CONGRESS CORPORATION, Cross-Defendant-Appellant.
MERCHANTS MATRIX CUT SYNDICATE, Inc., Cross-Claimant-Appellee,
v.
CLARK-CONGRESS CORPORATION, Cross-Defendant-Appellant.
THE ADVERTISING CHECKING BUREAU, Inc., Cross-Claimant-Appellee,
v.
CLARK-CONGRESS CORPORATION, Cross-Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 17, 1955.
Rehearings Denied February 23, 1955.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
No. 11017:
Robert Tieken, U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, George S. Swarth, Attys., U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Sherwood K. Platt, Edward B. Lucius, Edward G. Lucius, Chicago, Ill., Frank W. Sullivan, Chicago, Ill., Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellees.
No. 11019:
Harry E. Smoot, Chicago, Ill., Claude A. Roth, Chicago, Ill., Gottlieb & Schwartz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for cross-defendant-appellant.
Edward B. Lucius, Edward G. Lucius, Chicago, Ill., for Merchants Matrix Cut Syndicate, Inc., cross-claimant-appellee.
Nos. 11018-11020:
Sherwood K. Platt, Frank W. Sullivan, Chicago, Ill., Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, Edward B. Lucius, Edward G. Lucius, Horace A. Young, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.
Claude A. Roth, Chicago, Ill., Harry E. Smott, Chicago, Ill., Gottlieb & Schwartz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel for cross-defendant-appellant.
Perry W. Morton, Roger P. Marquis, George S. Swarth, for the United States as Amicus Curiae.
Before FINNEGAN, LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Rehearings Denied in 11017, 11019, 11020 February 23, 1955.
FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.
Condemnation proceedings1 involving leasehold interests, are here reviewed under the Government's notice of appeal, and three such notices filed by Clark-Congress Corporation. After judgment was entered, January 29, 1953, on jury verdicts of compensation for taking by eminent domain, the Government moved for a new trial and, in the alternative...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
