1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 164 Ohio
  5. 164 Ohio St. 138 (1955)
 

BLOOM v. WIDES

No. 34359.

164 Ohio St. 138 (1955)

BLOOM ET AL., APPELLEES, v. WIDES ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 27, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Milton H. Schmidt and Mr. Harry Kasfir, for appellees.

Mr. Nathan Solinger, Mr. Louis Weiland, Mr. Henry M. Bruestle, city solicitor, and Mr. Edgar W. Holtz, for appellants.

ZIMMERMAN, J.

It is earnestly contended by the plaintiffs, appellees in this court, that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be affirmed on the basis that the permit for the construction of the building to accommodate the car-wash business was not applied for by and was not issued to the "owner" in accordance with the Code of Ordinances of the City of Cincinnati, and that it is a nullity.

Section 1121...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases