1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 141 F.Supp.
  5. 141 F.Supp. 134 (1955)
 

ROBBINSDALE AMUSE. CORP. v. WARNER BROS. P. DIST. CORP.

Civ. No. 4584.

141 F.Supp. 134 (1955)

ROBBINSDALE AMUSEMENT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION, Universal Film Exchanges, Inc., United Artists Corporation, Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (a Delaware corporation), Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (a New York corporation), RKO Radio Pictures, Inc., Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, Minnesota Amusement Company, Loew's Incorporated, Columbia Pictures Corporation, Minneapolis Theatres, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

December 30, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee Loevinger, Louise A. Herou, and Larson, Loevinger, Lindquist, Freeman & Fraser, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

David Shearer, Minneapolis, Minn., (Shearer & Peters, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel), for all defendants with the exception of Minnesota Amusement Company and Minneapolis Theatres, Inc.

Mandt Torrison, Saint Paul, Minn. (Bundlie, Kelley & Maun, Saint Paul, Minn., of counsel), for Minnesota Amusement Company.

Edward C. Raftery, New York City (O'Brien, Driscoll & Raftery, New York City, of counsel), and Matthew J. Levitt, Minneapolis, Minn., for Minneapolis Theatres, Inc.

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

This cause came before the Court on a complaint filed by plaintiff under the anti-trust laws of the United States wherein it seeks an injunction and the recovery of damages.

The plaintiff corporation is the owner of a neighborhood or suburban theater located in Robbinsdale, Minnesota, called the Terrace, which was constructed between 1949 and 1951 at a cost of approximately $500,000. The stock of the corporation is owned principally by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases