1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 18 N.J.
  5. 18 N.J. 251 (1955)
 

STARK v. REINGOLD

18 N.J. 251 (1955)

113 A.2d 679

PHILIP STARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v. IRVING REINGOLD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. PHILIP STARK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v. IRVING REINGOLD AND SALLY REINGOLD, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. PHILIP STARK, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS, v. PARAMOUNT-HUDSON, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 14, 1955.

Decided April 25, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward R. McGlynn argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants-respondents (Messrs. Joseph Weintraub and Albert S. Gross, of counsel; Mr. David A. Gelber, attorney).

Mr. John Milton, Jr. argued the cause for the defendants as respondents and cross-appellants (Messrs. Milton, McNulty & Augelli, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed and the defendants have cross-appealed from a final judgment entered in the Chancery Division. We certified on our own motion under R.R. 1:10-1(a).

In 1949 Philip Stark and his brother Max Stark were interested in Paramount Motors, Inc., a Hudson car dealer at 187 Passaic Street, Hackensack, and Irving Reingold and his wife Sally Reingold were the owners of premises...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases