1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 35 N.J.
  5. 35 N.J. Super. 226 (1955)
 

MIDDLESEX CONCRETE, ETC. v. BOROUGH OF CARTERET

35 N.J. Super. 226 (1955)

113 A.2d 821

MIDDLESEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS AND EXCAVATING CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE BOROUGH OF CARTERET IN THE COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND LOUIS P. BOOZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 28, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Melvin J. Koestler argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Koestler & Koestler, attorneys).

Mr. Russell E. Watson argued the cause for defendant-appellant Borough of Carteret.

Mr. Elias A. Kanter argued the cause for defendant-respondent Louis P. Booz (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer and Sills, attorneys; Mr. David T. Wilentz, of counsel).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

We are concerned on this appeal with two questions: did the trial court err in refusing to open a summary judgment entered for the plaintiff and against the defendant borough as to 6 of the 23 counts of the complaint — the remaining counts not having as yet been reached for trial; and did it err in denying the Borough's application to amend its answer so as to add thereto certain separate defenses, counterclaims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases