1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 89 S.E.2d
  5. 89 S.E.2d 155 (1955)
 

HENSLEY v. HARRIS

No. 98.

89 S.E.2d 155 (1955)

242 N.C. 599

Edna HENSLEY v. Priscilla HARRIS, Paul O. Lamb and Paul T. Lamb.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 21, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harkins, Van Winkle, Walton & Buck, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.

E. L. Loftin, Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff produced ample evidence to require the submission of issues to a jury. Etheridge v. Etheridge, 222 N.C. 616, 24 S.E.2d 477. To claim the benefits of G.S. § 20-71.1, it was necessary for the plaintiff to show that she instituted her action within twelve months after the accident. For this purpose she offered the paper or document on which appeared the summons, the affidavit, the warrant of attachment, and the return of the officers. Appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases