CAFONE v. NESTO CONST. CO.


36 N.J. Super. 200 (1955)

115 A.2d 148

MICHAEL J. CAFONE, PLAINTIFF, v. NESTO CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION AND SPINIELLO CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court, Law Division.

Decided June 15, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Kalisch & Kalisch (Mr. Harry Kalisch appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.

Messrs. Porter & Hobart (Mr. Newton H. Porter, Jr., appearing), attorneys for defendants.


GAULKIN, J.C.C.

Plaintiff moves to amend his complaint. Defendant opposes the application on the sole ground that the proposed amendment sets up a new cause of action after the statute of limitations has run. Defendant's attorney, with commendable candor, admits that defendant will be prepared to meet the allegations of the proposed amendment. He makes no claim of surprise, or of other disadvantage or difficulty, such as the disappearance of evidence or of witnesses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases