SCHLOEMER v. TEEM

35682.

92 Ga. App. 140 (1955)

88 S.E.2d 280

SCHLOEMER et al. v. TEEM et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided June 6, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Fine, F. H. Boney, for plaintiffs in error.

Haas, White, Douglas & Arnold, E. S. White, contra.


GARDNER, P. J.

Since the judgment denying the motion for a new trial is to be reversed on special grounds, we will not discuss the general grounds, as the evidence may be entirely different on another trial.

1. Special ground 1 assigns error on the following: "The movants contend that a new trial should be granted for the reason that, while Mr. Woodrow Tucker, a witness for the defendants, was on the stand on direct examination, the following occurred: By...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases