1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 205 Or.
  5. 205 Or. 1 (1955)
 

JEWELL v. HARPER

205 Or. 1 (1955)

285 P.2d 133

JEWELL v. HARPER

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified June 29, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Otis Smith, of Ontario, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Max S. Taggart, of Ontario.

P.J. Gallagher argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Gallagher & Gallagher, of Ontario, and Vernon K. Smith, of Boise, Idaho.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

PERRY, J.

This is an appeal from a partnership accounting had pursuant to a determination by this court that a partnership existed between George Harper and William Jewell.

A statement of the facts surrounding the partnership is set out in the original opinion, Jewell v. Harper, 199 Or. 223, 258 P.2d 115, 260 P.2d 784. However...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases