SPECHT v. EASTWOOD-NEALLEY CORP.


34 N.J. Super. 156 (1955)

111 A.2d 781

HARRY G. SPECHT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. EASTWOOD-NEALLEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 11, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Ernest F. Keer, Jr., argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Boyd, Dodd, Keer & Booth, attorneys).

Mr. Vincent P. Biunno argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

This appeal raises a single issue. Did the trial court err by sustaining the action of the board of directors of the defendant corporation in cancelling the pension of appellant, Harry G. Specht?

A number of additional issues were presented during the course of a protracted trial. However, appellant has expressly accepted the findings on all phases of the case except that relating to his pension.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases