LAMPRON, J.
Defendant contends that the Court erred in submitting to the jury the issue of whether it provided suitable and adequate protective warning devices at Tibbetts Crossing.
The need of special protection at a given crossing depends upon the special features and facts connected with it. Among them are "the amount and character of travel, the extent of train movements over it, the operation, control and speed of the trains, the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.