1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 37 N.J.
  5. 37 N.J. Super. 117 (1955)
 

JOHNSON v. ANDERSON

37 N.J. Super. 117 (1955)

117 A.2d 42

J. KENDRICK JOHNSON, JR., TRADING AS THE HUNTERDON ADJUSTMENT SERVICE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DONALD ANDERSON AND ALLEN M. COTTRELL, T/A THE COTTRELL-ANDERSON PONTIAC CO., AND THE GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 5, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Franklin W. Kielb argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Charles Blume argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Chivian & Chivian, attorneys).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.

This appeal raises a question as to the proper construction of a section of the Uniform Conditional Sales Law.

The defendants Donald Anderson and Allen M. Cottrell, trading as The Cottrell-Anderson Pontiac Co., sold Wayne Blodgett a car pursuant to a conditional sales contract which stated that the sale was made:

"For a Total Time Price * * *                               $1644.90
    Computed...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases