1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 132 F.Supp.
  5. 132 F.Supp. 20 (1955)
 

DEMARKLES v. RUDOLPH WURLITZER COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 55-452.

132 F.Supp. 20 (1955)

Nicholas DEMARKLES v. The RUDOLPH WURLITZER COMPANY.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

June 9, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dangel & Sherry, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Timothy H. Donohue, Sherburne, Powers & Needham, Boston, Mass., for defendant.

ALDRICH, District Judge.

This is an action removed from the state court on the grounds of diversity. It is alleged to be for fraud, misrepresentation and deceit leading to the plaintiff's purchase of a number of juke boxes, so-called. The plaintiff, Demarkles, moves to remand, and the defendant, Wurlitzer, moves to quash the service of process.

Demarkles' motion alleges a number of inconsequential grounds, and one that is of some interest. On February 15,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases