The action was brought to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained by the plaintiffs when a heifer owned by the defendant, which had escaped from the defendant's pasture onto the highway, struck an automobile truck in which the plaintiffs were riding. The jury reported a verdict of no cause of action. The sole evidence on the point was to the effect that the fence on the highway side of the defendant's pasture was adequate so there was no basis for a finding...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
