EDELMAN v. FRINDEL


309 N.Y. 935 (1955)

Samuel Edelman, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders of 123 Cedar Street Corporation Similarly Situated, and on Behalf of Said Corporation, Appellant, v. Sam Frindel, Jr., et al., as Executors of Elias A. Cohen, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 28, 1955


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay Leo Rothschild for appellant.

Samuel Gottlieb, Alvin T. Sapinsley, respondent in person, and Harry Giesow for Sam Frindel, Jr., and others, respondents.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ. Dissent: VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that the personal representatives of Elias A. Cohen were under a fiduciary obligation to come forward with an explanation of the purpose to which these funds of 123 Cedar Street Corporation were applied, and that under the evidence in this record these funds must be held to have been expended for the purchase of an equity interest as contended by plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases