The second cause of action stated in the complaint, which must be taken by us as entirely true, alleges that the officers of the defendant village induced plaintiff to pay the village $750 to install water and sewer lines because of a representation by the public officers that such a payment was "the usual practice" and such payment was made by "all" other "property owners". It is alleged that the representation was false. If false it is actionable since the tort thus described...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
