In the main complaint, plaintiffs alleged against respondent, as defendant, that it had control of the street and the manhole and manhole cover which were alleged to have caused the accident. In its answer respondent denied that it had such control and asserted that the street was a private street. In the third-party complaint, respondent alleged that another third-party defendant maintained a sewer in the street for the special use and benefit of the appellant's apartment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
