1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Utah
  4. 4 Utah
  5. 4 Utah 2d 105 (1955)
 

DENVER & R.G.W.R. CO. v. CENTRAL WEBER SEWER I. DIST.

Nos. 8171-8176.

4 Utah 2d 105 (1955)

287 P.2d 884

DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO., RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL WEBER SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS. MOUNTAIN STATES TEL. & TEL. CO., RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL WEBER SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS. UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO., RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL WEBER SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS. BAMBERGER RAILROAD COMPANY AND BAMBERGER TRANSPORTATION CO., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL WEBER SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO., UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., OREGON SHORT LINE RAILROAD CO. AND OGDEN UNION RAILROAD & DEPOT CO., RESPONDENTS, v. CENTRAL WEBER SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS. MOUNTAIN FUEL SUPPLY CO., RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL WEBER SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Utah.

September 23, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

VanCott, Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy, Salt Lake City, for D. & R.G.W.R. Co. and Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co., respondents.

Frank J. Allen, Salt Lake City, for Utah Power & Light Co., respondent.

Skeen, Thurman, Worsley & Snow, Salt Lake City, for Bamberger R. Co., and Bamberger Transp. Co., respondents.

Bryan P. Leverich, M.J. Bronson, A.U. Miner, Howard F. Coray, Marvin J. Bertoch, Ray, Quinney & Nebeker, Salt Lake City, for Southern Pac. R. Co. et al., respondents.

Ray, Rawlins, Jones & Henderson, Salt Lake City, for Mountain Fuel Supply Co., respondent.

Wallace, Adams & Peterson, Ogden, for appellant.

HENRIOD, Justice.

Consolidated appeal by a sewer district from 6 judgments which excluded certain real and personal property (of gas, phone, power and 3 railroad companies) from the district and thus relieved it of the tax burden provided for in Chap. 32, Laws of Utah, 1951, the pertinent sections of which appear below, matters deemed unimportant for this case1 having been deleted, and italics supplied. Affirmed, no costs.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases