MATTER OF SMITH v. HARTMAN


208 Misc. 880 (1955)

In the Matter of Murray Smith, Petitioner, v. Carlton Hartman, as Building Code and Zoning Law Enforcement Officer of Geneva, and as City Planning Engineer, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Ontario County.

August 26, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Cleere and Joseph G. Caito for petitioner.

Frederick M. Toole for respondents.


JAMES C. O'BRIEN, J.

Petitioner is a barber by trade and for some years past carried on his occupation in a frame building located in the city of Geneva on the west side of Copeland Avenue at its intersection with Hamilton Street (No. 342 Hamilton St.). Until the common council enacted a new zoning law on December 31, 1953, petitioner was allowed to operate his barbershop at that location although the area was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases