SCHWARTZ v. BROADCAST MUSIC


130 F.Supp. 956 (1955)

Arthur SCHWARTZ et al., individually and on behalf of other writers and composers of musical compositions similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BROADCAST MUSIC, Inc., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

May 3, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis C. Leffler, New York City, for plaintiffs, for the motion.

Bannister, Stitt, Holloway & Krause, New York City, Edward W. Stitt, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for proposed substituted attorney.

Hays, St. John, Abramson & Heilbron, New York City, for present attorneys of record.


WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this anti-trust suit move for an order of substitution of a former partner of the present attorneys of record in the latter's place and stead. Thirty-two of the thirty-three plaintiffs have filed duly acknowledged consents to the substitution. (The thirty-third plaintiff is in Europe and it is anticipated his formal consent will soon be filed.) The issues on the motion center about the terms and conditions upon which the substitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases