1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 280 S.W.2d
  5. 280 S.W.2d 800 (1955)
 

R. L. HARRIS, INC., v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS & T. P. RY. CO.

280 S.W.2d 800 (1955)

R. L. HARRIS, Inc., et al. v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS & TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY et al.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

June 10, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lindsay, Young & Young and Grimm, Tapp & Carson, Knoxville, for complainants, appellants-appellees.

Witt, Gaither, Abernathy & Finlay, Chattanooga, for defendants, appellees-appellants.

TOMLINSON, Justice.

According to the allegations of the bill, accepted here as facts, the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company contracted with a co-defendant for extensive improvements, additions, etc., to its railroad property in Hamilton County known as Citico Yard. The complainants seek the enforcement of a lien against this railroad property under the provisions of Code Section 8002 for the satisfaction of indebtedness of a sub-contractor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases