1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 129 F.Supp.
  5. 129 F.Supp. 950 (1955)
 

CLARK v. DULLES

Civ. A. No. 2620-54.

129 F.Supp. 950 (1955)

William CLARK, Plaintiff, v. John Foster DULLES, Secretary of State, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

February 28, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris Ernst, New York City and Jack Wasserman, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Leo Rover, U. S. Atty., and Frank Strickler, Ass't U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for defendant.

SCHWEINHAUT, District Judge.

I have this day decided the case of Nathan v. Dulles, D.C., 129 F.Supp. 951, and the reasoning in that case applies equally, it seems to me, in this one. It is urged by the government that the plaintiff had a "hearing" in that he personally talked to and corresponded with the then Under Secretary of State. I do not believe that that was a hearing in the sense that the law has in mind. I think, therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases