1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.
  4. 286 A.D.
  5. 286 A.D. 767 (1955)
 

RUZA v. RUZA

286 A.D. 767 (1955)

Sophie K. Ruza, Respondent, v. Stanley W. Ruza et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 20, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Jordan Lee of counsel (Nathan Weber with him on the brief; H. Jordan Lee, attorney), for appellants.

Lester Samuels of counsel (Milton C. Weisman and Harry Snetkin with him on the brief; Weisman, Celler, Allan, Spett & Sheinberg, attorneys), for respondent.

Concur — PECK, P. J., BREITEL, BASTOW and COX, JJ.

BREITEL, J.

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency. Special Term denied the motion.

The complaint is substantially a running narrative. It relates a scheme, described as a conspiracy, to destroy the marital and financial status of plaintiff. The scheme is alleged to have been carried forward by plaintiff's stepsons and the corporation they and plaintiff's husband dominated. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases