1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 125 F.Supp.
  5. 125 F.Supp. 849 (1954)
 

NYE v. LOVELACE

Civ. No. 1139.

125 F.Supp. 849 (1954)

Clark C. NYE, Plaintiff, v. Edwin M. LOVELACE, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. Alabama, S. D.

Motion to Amend Findings and Conclusions Denied December 30, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Harold Thweatt, Embry, Crowe, Tolbert, Boxley, & Johnson, Oklahoma City, Okl., Ralph G. Holberg, Jr., Holberg, Tully & Aldridge, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff.

William G. Caffey (of Caffey, Gallalee & Caffey), Mobile, Ala., for defendant.

THOMAS, District Judge.

This action arises out of a disagreement as to the purchase and ownership of certain mineral interests in Escambia County, in what is known as the Pollard Oil Field. The controversy involves three questions:

1. Were certain mineral interests, upon which the defendant made a profit, purchased for the plaintiff's account, or purchased by the defendant and sold to the plaintiff?

2. Did the defendant have the right to purchase for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases