1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 83 S.E.2d
  5. 83 S.E.2d 883 (1954)
 

CHARLES M. BRITT COMPANY v. BAREFOOT & TATUM DRUGS

No. 102.

83 S.E.2d 883 (1954)

240 N.C. 755

CHARLES M. BRITT COMPANY, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, and Charles M. Britt, Individually, v. BAREFOOT & TATUM DRUGS, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 13, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee & Marler, H. Kenneth Lee, Asheville, for plaintiffs-appellants.

George Pennell, Asheville, for defendant-appellee.

JOHNSON, Justice.

The stipulations of the parties charted the course of the trial and established the alleged acts of forgery so as to entitle the corporate plaintiff to recover the face amount of the forged checks, 50 Am. Jur., Stipulations, Sec. 9; 7 Am.Jur., Banks, Sec. 697; Annotations: 31 A.L.R. 1068, 67 A.L.R. 1535, unless the right of recovery was defeated by the defendant's plea in bar based on negligence of the plaintiffs. The plea in bar was submitted to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases