LAZAR v. KNOLLS COOP. SECTION NO. 2


205 Misc. 748 (1954)

David Lazar, Individually and as a Stockholder of Knolls Cooperative Section No. 2 Inc., Suing on Behalf of Himself and All Other Stockholders of Said Corporation, Similarly Situated, and for the Said Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Knolls Cooperative Section No. 2 Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County.

March 9, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simon Gallet for plaintiff.

Robert S. Olnick for Knolls Cooperative Section No. 2 Inc., defendant.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl for Dry Dock Savings Bank, defendant.


CORCORAN, J.

The plaintiff's motion for an injunction pendente lite and the defendant's motion for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice will be considered together.

On the motion to dismiss, the truth of the following facts alleged in the complaint must be assumed true. The defendant, the Knolls Cooperative Section No. 2 Inc. (to which I will refer as ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases