1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 267 Wis.
  5. 267 Wis. 639 (1954)
 

PAULSON v. PAULSON

267 Wis. 639 (1954)

PAULSON, Appellant, vs. PAULSON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 9, 1954.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Leo W. Slensby, attorney, and William B. Rubin of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Rubin.

For the respondent there was a brief by Fairchild, Foley & Sammond, Vernon A. Swanson, and Harrold J. McComas, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Swanson and Mr. McComas.

GEHL, J.

If it be determined that the provision of the judgment is valid it follows that it is not necessary to determine the questions of present jurisdiction and practice which are raised by defendant.

Petitioner construes the judgment as depriving the minor son of support and as operating to relieve the father from the obligation to support him. Consequently, it is contended that the provision is void. Her contention cannot be sustained. Sec. 247.24, Stats...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases