SCOTTEN v. LANGLEY

No. 241.

83 S.E.2d 815 (1954)

240 N.C. 762

C. R. SCOTTEN v. William LANGLEY and V. M. Dorsett, trading as D & L Drive-In and City Taxi.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 13, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seawell & Wilson, by H. F. Seawell, Jr., Carthage, for plaintiff-appellant.

Claude Bittle, Durham, for defendant-appellee.


PER CURIAM.

We have carefully studied the evidence in the record, considering it in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and giving him the benefit of every inference which the evidence fairly supports. A serious question arises as to whether the plaintiff has alleged a partnership between the defendants. Conceding, but not deciding that he has, we are of opinion, and so hold, that the evidence totally fails to make out a case to be submitted to the jury as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases